In the fourth quarter of 2023, China emerged as the top green bond market globally. Sales of internationally aligned green bonds in China reached US$21.83 billion in the final three months of 2023, up 131% on a quarterly basis, according to the Climate Bonds Initiative data. This was well ahead of the No. 2 market, the U.S., which had green bond sales of US$12.87 billion and No. 3 Germany, which recorded sales of US$7.14 billion.

Singapore-based payments fintech Nium has been busy expanding internationally as it seeks to put itself in the most favorable position possible ahead of a planned IPO in 2025. In recent months, Nium has expanded on multiple continents, from South America to different parts of Asia.

With Thailand finally getting its digital banking application process underway, it is worth taking a closer look at the prospective applicants. As expected, startups are nowhere to be found. Instead, the likely applicants – and winners – are a mix of Thailand’s ultra-wealthy tycoons, prominent incumbent banks and Asian tech giants.

With funding for fintech startups having fallen precipitously from the days of ultra-low interest rates and a focus on growth at all costs, a reality is setting in: Disrupting the giants of incumbent financial services is no easy task. In many cases, it has proven elusive.

India’s United Payments Interface (UPI) payments rail is the most successful initiative of its kind. Domestically, UPI has achieved a dominance that no other payments rail is likely to surpass. According to a report by PwC, it is projected that daily UPI transactions will reach 1 billion by FY 2026-27, representing approximately 90% of India's non-cash transactions. 2024 started with UPI transactions processed in January reaching a record high of INR 18.41 trillion. Given UPI's success, India has sought to expand its footprint internationally and in the past few years it has become available in a number of countries from the United Arab Emirates and Bhutan to the UK and France. Yet questions remain about whether UPI can serve as a foundational platform for digital payments outside of India.

Cybersecurity has always been a crucial aspect of operations for financial institutions and technology providers alike. However, the intensifying digitization of financial services, combined with increasing computational power and the ongoing shift of financial activities online, is amplifying cybersecurity’s importance. With the annual cost of cybercrime soaring worldwide, financial institutions and market participants across Asia Pacific must reevaluate and reinforce their cybersecurity.

Singapore has been battling a surge in financial crime since the coronavirus pandemic, with 2023 being notable as the city-state dealt with its largest ever money laundering case. The investigation is ongoing and thus far authorities have seized more than US$2.2 billion. However, more mundane types of financial crime continue to be a challenge for Singapore, notably online scams. In 2023, scams reported in Singapore rose roughly 47% to 46,563, the highest amount since the police began tracking this type of crime in 2016.

Since its return to China in 1997, Hong Kong has become the country’s indispensable offshore financial center, with considerable international links. It has engaged in financial innovation, such as the cultivation of the world’s premier offshore renminbi trading hub. However, Hong Kong also faces much more competition from Singapore than it did in the late 1990s, and other Asian cities like Tokyo.

Both Razorpay and Paytm are Indian fintech unicorns that have at different times struggled with  mercurial regulators, but that’s about where the similarities end. Razorpay has focused only on the B2B segment, while Paytm has tried to gain a foothold in both retail and non-retail payments. While both companies have relied heavily on venture capital investment, Razorpay has very little, if any exposure, to China in this regard, while Ant Group’s stake in Paytm is coming under increasing scrutiny. With Paytm’s payments bank in mortal danger and Razorpay preparing to move its domicile from the U.S. to India while planning an IPO, the two fintech unicorns are both at inflection points. However, just one of them is ascendant.

The chill in fintech funding that saw investment in the sector fall 75% in 2023 dovetails with growing investor skepticism of unsustainable business models. In private markets, that is reflected in the difficulty of raising big-ticket funding, while for listed companies it is painfully obvious from battered share prices, regulatory travails and a continuing struggle to shift away from a growth-first ethos.

Platform companies – or as they often refer to themselves, “super apps” – in Southeast Asia, India and Korea are all to some degree facing one or more of these challenges, and it is unclear how well prepared they are to make changes to their business models to ensure future growth is sustainable.

Don’t say we didn’t warn you

Some of the most prominent platform companies in Asia are facing intensifying regulatory scrutiny due at least in part to their own missteps. No matter what the outcome, there will be implications for their fintech businesses given the paramountcy of customer trust in financial services.

The latest erstwhile high flyer to fall afoul of regulators is India’s Paytm, whose payments bank has been ordered to cease providing most services by Feb. 29 and which could lose its payments license. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and other government agencies suspect the payments bank of multiple violations, notably inadequate money-laundering controls. While Paytm has denied any wrongdoing and has publicly conveyed a sense of being caught off guard, media reports suggest that the RBI had warned the company over problematic dealings between its payments bank and payments app over the past two years that were not heeded. It is likely that in its long-running rush for growth at all costs, which included expansion into everything from gold investment to stock trading, Paytm may have overlooked important aspects of compliance.

Meanwhile, China’s Ant Group is just starting to emerge from a regulatory crackdown that lasted almost three years and sharply decreased its valuation and margins on many of its services. If it does eventually go public, Ant will not come close to the $34.5 billion it was expected to raise in November 2020 – which would have been the largest IPO of all time. Further, Ant founder Jack Ma – the architect of some of its greatest successes as well as its falling out with regulators given his unwillingness to read the writing on the wall – has been forced to relinquish control over the company’s operations. It is unclear how successful Ant will be when it is regulated more like a bank and does not have Ma at the helm.

While its misstep has not yet led to consequences as significant as those faced by Paytm or Ant, Korea’s Kakao has also recently had regulatory issues. In November 2023, prosecutors raided Kakao's office building in Pangyo, Gyeonggi, alleging that the tech juggernaut had engaged in stock manipulation during its takeover of K-pop agency SM Entertainment. Prosecutors say that Kakao violated Korea’s Capital Markets Act. Because of that alleged offense, chief investment officer Bae Jae-hyun was indicted. Prosecutors reported that Bae and two other executives manipulated the stock price 409 times on Feb. 16, 17, 27 and 28. They further alleged that Kakao did not report the stock purchases to the Financial Supervisory Service.

Investors know best

The reaction of investors in public markets to the travails of platform companies in Asia is instructional for evaluating real-world implications of their missteps. When these companies were still protected by the mysterious working of private markets, it was hard to measure the impact of their regulatory problems or questionable business models. No longer.

Across the board – and despite their almost universally strong fintech businesses – these companies are not performing well in the stock market. The most severe at the moment is Paytm. Currently trading at about 325 Indian rupees, it has fallen 23% in the past five days and 56% in the past month, wiping out billions of dollars in market capitalization. The freefall is likely to continue unless Indian regulators give the company a reprieve.

Meanwhile, Kakao Pay’s share price has fallen about 14% in the past month to 48,800 won, while Kakao Bank’s has decreased by about 2% to 29,800 won. While Kakao Bank posted a net profit in 2023, Kakao Pay lost money.

Some platform companies that have not had regulatory trouble, but whose business models remain unproven, are also underperforming in the stock market as investors remain unconvinced about their prospects. These companies include Singapore’s Sea Group and Grab as well as Indonesia’s GoTo. Sea’s stock has fallen precipitously from an all-time high of $366.99 on October 19, 2021 to less than $43. Grab’s share price has failed to rise above the low single digits, while GoTo’s has fallen 30% in the past year and 9% in the past six months.

Back to basics

With the era of cheap, easy money – which encouraged startups with questionable business models to burn cash to grow quickly – over, we suspect that some of the firms will have to make adjustments to their core business models to remain competitive with both incumbent banks and certain pure-play fintechs that are not weighed down with the baggage of things like a ride-hailing or food-delivery business, or deep-seated regulatory travails.

Something we often hear from defenders of these companies is that it takes Big Tech a while to become profitable. They point to Amazon and Facebook, which needed eight and five years, respectively, to achieve profitability. Google, meanwhile, became profitable less than three years after its founding.

We find that argument of dubious accuracy. Companies like Paytm, Grab and GoTo are more than a decade old, while Sea is nine years old, and they are not first movers in their respective industries in the same way the U.S. companies were. In fact, the Southeast Asian companies didn’t even enter financial services until they realized they needed a better story to tell investors.

Ant Group, on the other hand, was a first mover and despite its restructuring and reduced margins, will be a major force in China’s fintech sector – and maybe in some overseas markets eventually – for years to come.

The same is true for Ant-backed Kakao to some extent, and the company has an advantage over Southeast Asian super apps in that it is not stretched too thin and its businesses are better separated.

Looking ahead, the forthcoming earnings reports of Grab, GoTo and Sea should shed some additional light on where they need to make adjustments to their respective business models. We expect that all three companies will report strong growth in their fintech units in the fourth quarter of 2023, but we are less certain about their other businesses.